New islamic idology

Is circumcision a religious ruling and a legal duty? The answer is simply no. It is not a legal ruling, And it is not legislation of the Islamic religion at all. It was not revealed in any divine book in what was previously revealed It is Jewish legislation. And entered into Islamic culture, and inserted in the references It came through the practices of primitive African tribes And spread there, and reached what is called countries in North Africa, Islamic countries Of course, when we say circumcision, We mean male and female circumcision. What it is amputation a part of the genital organ in known detail. This circumcision spread in The whole Islamic world as a whole. As usual inherited and continued in the nation, and no one discusses it. Whereas if we came to the Qur’an and followed it from its beginning to its end. We do not find nor any text that legalizes circumcision. Neither male nor female. This indicates that circumcision Something that came from outside the Qur’an. And the f...

A woman’s head or hair covering is masculine, rather than a Qur’anic ordinance) God Almighty said: {And tell the believing women to reduce ‘some’ of their vision and guard their vulvas (private parts) and not expose their adornment except that which ‘necessarily’ appears thereof and to wrap ‘a portion of’ their covers over their chests and not expose their adornment except to their husbands, their fathers, their husbands’ fathers, their sons, their husbands’ sons, their brothers, their brothers’ sonاs, their sisters’ sons, their women (new social relations in women’s life with males such as the son-in-law, the stepson, the foster sun) and whom they own through what is agreed upon by contracts and agreements, or those male attendants having no physical desire, or children who are not yet aware of the private aspects of women. And let them not stamp their feet (let them not do what might bring about displaying their congenital beauty to men: such as dancing) to make known what they conce...

     The Provident Creator created the universe as double-edged dual mates (pairs), and made that a fixed law. The Almighty said:{And of all things we created two mates, that you may remember}, [Athariyat: 49], where the word (mates) does not denote two of the same type, that is: a male and a male, but rather it denotes a male and a female, each of them is a mate of the other from creation. Actually, it means that there is a relationship of compatibility, integrity and harmony between them, while there is no relationship of integration between two of the same gender, and therefore, it is not correct to call them “mates”, but rather they are merely two. Man is a species implying mates of the male and the female, and every male is a mate for a female in initial creation, and vice versa, every female is a mate for a male from creation. The Divine law came down to organize this relationship consciously, that is, it did not come down to grant legalization fot its practice...

  The title of the lecture is part of a Qur’anic text that should be returned to its position from in text if we want to study it objectively. In fact, that is because separating it from its location in the text and understanding it based superficially on what is common on people’s tongues regarding the use of the meanings of words together with the influence of the masculine concept of culture  led to the statement of male guardianship over females, even though the text does not contain any word confirming what the commentators maintained. Now, here is the full text: {Men are in charge of women by [right of] what Allah has given one over the other and by what they spend [for sustenance] from their wealth. So, righteous women are devoutly obedient, guarding in [the husband’s] absence what Allah would have them guard. But those [wives] from whom you fear discord/rebellion –  [first] advise them; [then if they persist], forsake them in bed; and [finally], strike them. But i...

  Before it became certain, certainty was in the stage of doubt, study, uncertainty and hypothesis. It is initially atheory, but having been proven it becomes a constant certainty that does not change. Uncertainty, hypothesis, probability and a theory may all be changed, modified or developed, but certainty is not affected by such things, otherwise, it couldn’t initially be certainty. The terms, divisions, and definitions are neither binding nor proof of anything. Due to the misunderstanding of induction and the influence of the terminology and divisions, the concept of causality has been described by some as being incomplete induction, influenced by Aristotle’s division of induction into two kinds: the complete induction and the incomplete induction, although the definition of complete induction by Aristotle is a state of mind that cannot occur in reality because it is impossible to conduct a study or do an experiment on the general elements of any object under study in all existe...

Man claimed that he is an Imam in mosque in USA and said : the (male and male or female and female ) Homosexuality  is allowable because there is not a clear verse in Quran that makes the Homosexuality  a sin (Haram) based on the rule : the origin in things is allowable except the text (Quran), and there is no any punishment verse for who  practice it . I do not know if he has really copy of Quran like what we have or another copy !! because he did not find the verse that says about the forbidden and the punishment verse !  lets read together brothers – Abomination  Forebodement {قُلْ إِنَّمَا حَرَّمَ رَبِّيَ الْفَوَاحِشَ مَا ظَهَرَ مِنْهَا وَمَا بَطَنَ وَالإِثْمَ وَالْبَغْيَ بِغَيْرِ الْحَقِّ وَأَن تُشْرِكُواْ بِاللّهِ مَا لَمْ يُنَزِّلْ بِهِ سُلْطَاناً وَأَن تَقُولُواْ عَلَى اللّهِ مَا لاَ تَعْلَمُونَ }الأعراف33 – sexual sufficiency is only in marriage {وَالَّذِينَ هُمْ لِفُرُوجِهِمْ حَافِظُونَ } {إِلَّا عَلَى أَزْوَاجِهِمْ أوْ مَا مَلَكَتْ أَيْمَانُهُمْ فَإِن...